Swiftly does it! Swift v Carpenter clarifies the approach to accommodation claims in personal injury matters
Articles
28 Oct 2020
Issue based costs orders and Part 36 offers: Terracorp and IT Protect analysed
Articles
26 Oct 2020
Confidential information—knowledge of unlawfulness not required for unlawful means conspiracy (The Racing Partnership Ltd v Sports Information Services Ltd)
Articles
26 Oct 2020
Revisiting interim payments in IPFDA 1975 claims: Weisz v Weisz [2019] EWHC 3101 (Fam)
Articles
26 Oct 2020
Litigating on behalf of P: Guidance for Deputies on seeking permission and managing conflicts
Articles
22 Oct 2020
Facts in issue and preliminary facts: seeing double or is there a difference?
Articles
16 Oct 2020
Belsner v Cam Legal Services: An important clarification – What information a solicitor should provide to a client concerning likely costs that may be recovered from the opponent
Articles
14 Oct 2020
The importance of acting with “reasonable promptitude” when applying for relief from forfeiture: Keshwala and another v Bhalsod [2020] EWHC 2372 (QB)
Articles
14 Oct 2020
Justice delayed might be justice denied… but for which side? A look at Nigeria v Process & Industrial Developments
Book
12 Oct 2020
Halsbury’s Laws of England, Education (vols 35 – 36A) 2020
Articles
07 Oct 2020
Setting aside judgment for non-attendance: not necessarily what you may expect
Articles
06 Oct 2020
Causation in insurance law – a new interpretation?
![Revisiting interim payments in IPFDA 1975 claims: Weisz v Weisz [2019] EWHC 3101 (Fam)](https://staging.gatehouselaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/shutterstock_447695698-600x400.webp)
![The importance of acting with “reasonable promptitude” when applying for relief from forfeiture: Keshwala and another v Bhalsod [2020] EWHC 2372 (QB)](https://staging.gatehouselaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Houses-scaled-1-600x400.webp)
