Amanda Illing featured in Advocate’s ‘Bar in the Community’ Campaign
Articles
31 Jul 2023
Unravelling it all: challenging judgments tainted by fraud
Video
28 Jul 2023
Brew: where now for litigation funding? The likely impact of the Supreme Court’s decision in R (on the application of PACCAR Inc and others) v Competition Appeal Tribunal and others [2023] UKSC 28
Articles
27 Jul 2023
Party poopers at sporting events – to injunct or not to injunct?
Articles
26 Jul 2023
Where now for litigation funding? The likely impact of the Supreme Court’s decision in R (on the application of PACCAR Inc and others) v Competition Appeal Tribunal and others [2023] UKSC 28
Newsletter
26 Jul 2023
Focus On… Professional Liability
Articles
25 Jul 2023
Fraud on the Court: When Post-Trial Evidence Vitiates Judgment (Tinkler v Esken Ltd (Formerly Stobart Group Ltd) [2023] EWCA Civ 655)
Video
21 Jul 2023
Professional Liability Brew: Discovery Land v Axis Specialty and the application of the dishonesty exclusion in professional indemnity policies
Articles
20 Jul 2023
Judge wrong to refuse to adjourn a trial when a party displayed COVID-19 symptoms (Miah v Ahmed)
Articles
18 Jul 2023
Order granting permission under section 139 of the Mental Health Act upheld despite procedural errors (Upadrasta v Commissioner of the City of London Police)
Articles
17 Jul 2023
Case comment: Boydell v NZP Ltd & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 373
Articles
12 Jul 2023
Do receivers get “immunity” from future claims when the Court sanctions a sale? (Denaxe Limited v Cooper and Rubin)
![Brew: where now for litigation funding? The likely impact of the Supreme Court’s decision in R (on the application of PACCAR Inc and others) v Competition Appeal Tribunal and others [2023] UKSC 28](https://staging.gatehouselaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/gatehouse.on_.demand.cover_-600x360.webp)
![Where now for litigation funding? The likely impact of the Supreme Court’s decision in R (on the application of PACCAR Inc and others) v Competition Appeal Tribunal and others [2023] UKSC 28](https://staging.gatehouselaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/shutterstock_1740173231-600x400.webp)
![Fraud on the Court: When Post-Trial Evidence Vitiates Judgment (Tinkler v Esken Ltd (Formerly Stobart Group Ltd) [2023] EWCA Civ 655)](https://staging.gatehouselaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/shutterstock_447999094-scaled-1-600x400.webp)
![Case comment: Boydell v NZP Ltd & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 373](https://staging.gatehouselaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/shutterstock_1558796276-600x401.webp)
